Conexiant
Login
  • The Analytical Scientist
  • The Cannabis Scientist
  • The Medicine Maker
  • The Ophthalmologist
  • The Pathologist
  • The Traditional Scientist
The Medicine Maker
  • Explore

    Explore

    • Latest
    • Features
    • Interviews
    • Business & Trends
    • Technology & Manufacturing
    • Product Profiles
    • White Papers

    Featured Topics

    • Biopharma
    • Small Molecules
    • Cell & Gene
    • Future of Pharma

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
    • Cell and Gene Therapy Supplement
  • Topics

    Techniques & Tools

    • Drug Discovery
    • Development & Clinical
    • Formulation
    • Drug Delivery
    • Bioprocessing
    • Small Molecules
    • Cell and Gene
    • Facilities & Equipment
    • Outsourcing
    • Packaging
    • Supply Chain
    • Regulation & Standards

    Applications & Fields

    • Clinical
    • Environmental
    • Food, Beverage & Agriculture
    • Pharma & Biopharma
    • Omics
    • Forensics
  • News & Blogs

    News & Blogs

    • Industry News
    • Research News
    • Blogs
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Community & Awards

    Community & Awards

    • Power List
    • Sitting Down With
    • Innovation Awards
    • Company of the Year Awards
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • eBooks
Subscribe
Subscribe
The Medicine Maker / Issues / 2025 / Articles / Mar / The Future of the NIH
Business & Regulation Standards & Regulation Business Practice Trends & Forecasts Small Molecules Business & Trends Small Molecules

The Future of the NIH

Thoughts on the US National Institutes of Health and its role in funding research for non-opioid therapeutics.

By Hernan Bazan 03/27/2025 2 min read

Share

Throughout my career, spanning surgery, research, and life science entrepreneurship, I’ve seen first-hand how deeply we need safer, more effective pain therapies. As a clinician, I understand that opioids may be necessary for severe pain, though their potential for misuse is devastating.

Despite the pressing demand, the innovation pipeline for non-opioid therapeutics remains alarmingly thin. In my experience, the single most critical factor in whether new drug development flourishes or stalls in the US is the level of support provided by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH). Indeed, more than 90 percent of FDA-approved therapies tracing their origins back to NIH-funded research. Crucial early-stage research is often too risky for private investment, making NIH funding indispensable. In fact, history has shown that groundbreaking therapies, from cancer to stroke treatments, often emerge from what initially seems obscure, fundamental scientific inquiries. By investing in high-risk, high-reward research, the NIH lays the foundation for the next generation of medical breakthroughs. 

I watch with anticipation as Jay Bhattacharya prepares to take on the leadership of the NIH under the Trump administration. He inherits a scientific landscape undergoing rapid transformation. Emerging breakthroughs – from mRNA-based vaccines to advanced gene-editing tools – have shown how quickly medical revolutions can take hold when scientists are empowered with the resources and freedom to explore bold ideas. Looking ahead, we have an unprecedented opportunity to harness similar innovations to transform the safer treatment of pain.

Realizing this vision, however, will require a dual focus on entrepreneurial thinking and unwavering commitment to fundamental science. I have been fortunate to receive multiple NIH grants (and have two under review), including the 2024 NIH HEAL Director’s Trailblazer Award for developing a novel non-opioid analgesic. Through that journey, I’ve seen how an agile, well-supported NIH can drive innovation. Streamlining grant processes to eliminate redundancies could significantly accelerate the transition from laboratory discovery to clinical testing. A fresh look at indirect cost reimbursements is also vital – robust research infrastructure doesn’t exist in a vacuum. Undermining these critical funds risks stalling transformative advancements not just in pain, but across the fields of cancer, stroke, and beyond.

At the same time, entrepreneurial thinking should be woven into the NIH’s future and fostering stronger private-public partnerships will be essential. Targeted seed funding for promising therapeutics, expanded translational research programs, and closer collaboration between the NIH, academia, and industry can ensure that life-changing discoveries actually reach the bedside, bridging the gap between discovery and real-world impact. By leveraging the unique strengths of each sector, we can develop not just one new therapy, but a whole slate of non-opioid options that attack pain through diverse mechanisms – precisely what we need to tackle conditions spanning acute surgical pain, chronic back pain, neuropathic disorders, and more.

Ultimately, the goal is straightforward: better outcomes for patients facing debilitating acute, chronic, and neuropathic pain, with fewer risks of addiction, overdose, and harmful side effects. Achieving this will depend on how effectively NIH balances bold scientific exploration with a forward-thinking approach to drug development. By honoring its legacy and embracing this challenge, the NIH can supercharge the quest for multiple, safer, non-opioid pain candidates and we stand poised to deliver a medical breakthrough on par with many of the most significant innovations in our nation’s history – redefining pain treatment and offering real hope to the millions who desperately need it.

Newsletters

Receive the latest analytical science news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

About the Author(s)

Hernan Bazan

CEO, South Rampart Pharma, Inc.

More Articles by Hernan Bazan

False

Advertisement

Recommended

False

Related Content

What Trump’s Latest Moves Mean for the Industry
Business Practice Standards & Regulation Trends & Forecasts Bioprocessing - Upstream & Downstream
What Trump’s Latest Moves Mean for the Industry

May 27, 2025

6 min read

Audrey Greenberg’s latest insight on US-based manufacturing, Trump’s “Administration for A Healthy America”, and an ever-shifting regulatory environment.

Regulators Target Ebola
Standards & Regulation
Regulators Target Ebola

December 1, 2014

0 min read

Will FDA fast review and voucher incentives make a difference?

Safety First - Sizing Up Biologics Side Effects
Standards & Regulation Biosimilars
Safety First - Sizing Up Biologics Side Effects

December 2, 2014

0 min read

Biologic medicines present unique challenges for pharmacovigilance. And with biosimilars hitting the market, life just got more complicated – especially when products share the same name.

United Science Stands
Small Molecules Standards & Regulation
United Science Stands

December 2, 2014

0 min read

Sitting Down With… William Chin, Executive Vice President, Scientific and Regulatory Affairs, Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA).

The Medicine Maker
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.