Conexiant
Login
  • The Analytical Scientist
  • The Cannabis Scientist
  • The Medicine Maker
  • The Ophthalmologist
  • The Pathologist
  • The Traditional Scientist
The Medicine Maker
  • Explore

    Explore

    • Latest
    • Features
    • Interviews
    • Business & Trends
    • Technology & Manufacturing
    • Product Profiles
    • White Papers

    Featured Topics

    • Biopharma
    • Small Molecules
    • Cell & Gene
    • Future of Pharma

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
    • Cell and Gene Therapy Supplement
  • Topics

    Topics

    • Drug Discovery
    • Development & Clinical
    • Formulation
    • Drug Delivery
    • Bioprocessing
    • Small Molecules
    • Cell and Gene
    • Facilities & Equipment
    • Outsourcing
    • Packaging
    • Supply Chain
    • Regulation & Standards
  • News & Blogs

    News & Blogs

    • Industry News
    • Research News
    • Blogs
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Community & Awards

    Community & Awards

    • Power List
    • Sitting Down With
    • Innovation Awards
    • Company of the Year Awards
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • eBooks
Subscribe
Subscribe
The Medicine Maker / Issues / 2019 / Articles / Jan / Proactive Policies
Business & Regulation Standards & Regulation Business & Trends Sponsored

Proactive Policies

Gearing up for 2019, the EMA shares revised guidelines to better protect the environment, and unveils plans to protect us all in a health emergency

By Maryam Mahdi 01/22/2019 0 min read Quick Read (pre 2022)

Share

As our global populations grow and the demographics of the developed world change, the pharma industry is beginning to feel the strain. The pharmaco-economic burden of catering to the healthcare needs of the masses is spiraling, but the European Medicines Agency (EMA) is not idly standing by.

The environment at risk

Twelve years after the release of the original document, the EMA has published a revised version of its “environmental risk assessment (ERA) of human medicines” for a 6-month public consultation. The purpose of reissuing the document was to help clarify when ERA studies are required and improve the consistency of these assessments (1).

Biologically-active pharmaceuticals can enter the environment in a number of ways, including through manufacturing discharge, human use, and inappropriate disposal, and have been shown to directly affect wildlife. As one example, the API in the contraceptive pill has been found to feminize some male fish. The guideline aims to protect aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems including surface water, groundwater, soil and secondary poisoning, as well as microbial communities in sewage treatment plants. In Europe, an ERA is mandatory for any pharma company submitting a marketing authorization application and should be based on “the use of the product and the physico-chemical, ecotoxicological, and fate properties of its active substance.”

The revised guidelines include:

  • A detailed decision tree to provide more thorough technical guidance to applicants.

  • Introduction of the term “endocrine active substances” to include all compounds that affect development or reproduction.

  • Additional guidance on secondary poisoning (the exposure of predators to pharmaceuticals through the food chain).

  • Suggestions to limit laboratory test methods to reduce the burden of testing on applicants.

The guidelines also encourage applicants to share data generated for the ERA to avoid the repetition of studies.

Stakeholders wishing to comment on the guidance must do so by June 30, 2019. Further details are on the EMA’s website (1).

Emergency protection

The Spanish Flu outbreak of 1918 affected lives on a global scale. One hundred years later, despite advances in healthcare and pharmaceutical interventions, the threat of cross-border disease outbreaks still looms. The last decade – with outbreaks of H1N1 virus, Ebola and Zika – has proven just how real and present the danger is.

In line with its strategy for 2022, the EMA has prioritized planning for, responding to and communicating on serious health topics, and has published a plan of how the agency would respond to health emergencies, whether it be infection, chemical, environmental or “of unknown origin”. Building upon the 2006 pandemic influenza plan, the document reflects upon information gained during the 2009 influenza pandemic and the 2014 Ebola crisis to ensure readiness in dealing with emerging health threats (2). Some of the key aims of the plan are:

  • To initiate and coordinate scientific and regulatory activities by involving all interested parties within the EMA and the European Medicines Regulatory network.

  • To manage and coordinate the discussions on development, authorization and surveillance of relevant medicinal products, such as vaccines and antivirals for pandemic influenza.

  • To effectively communicate relevant information to healthcare professionals, patients and regulatory partners.

  • To provide support to international partners, such as stakeholders involved in the research and development of medicinal products, as required.

The document outlines three different levels of health threat plan, which translate into different levels of EMA staff involvement; Level 4 represents the highest level of threat (pandemic). The processes stress the importance of continued and frequent dialogue within the European region and industry. Though the plan details the regulatory activities that the EMA would initiate during a disease outbreak, it does not cover how manufacturing issues related to specific medicines would be dealt with.

Newsletters

Receive the latest analytical science news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

References

  1. European Medicines Agency, “Revised guideline to assess risk of human medicines for the environment,” (2019). Available at: https://bit.ly/2FYc8zT. Last accessed January 8, 2019. European Medicines Agency. “Responding to emerging health threats in the EU,” (2019). Available at: https://bit.ly/2BUVoEt. Last accessed January 8, 2019.

About the Author(s)

Maryam Mahdi

After finishing my degree, I envisioned a career in science communications. However, life took an unexpected turn and I ended up teaching abroad. Though the experience was amazing and I learned a great deal from it, I jumped at the opportunity to work for Texere. I'm excited to see where this new journey takes me!

More Articles by Maryam Mahdi

False

Advertisement

Recommended

False

Related Content

What Trump’s Latest Moves Mean for the Industry
Business Practice Standards & Regulation Trends & Forecasts Bioprocessing - Upstream & Downstream
What Trump’s Latest Moves Mean for the Industry

May 27, 2025

6 min read

Audrey Greenberg’s latest insight on US-based manufacturing, Trump’s “Administration for A Healthy America”, and an ever-shifting regulatory environment.

Regulators Target Ebola
Standards & Regulation
Regulators Target Ebola

December 1, 2014

0 min read

Will FDA fast review and voucher incentives make a difference?

Safety First - Sizing Up Biologics Side Effects
Standards & Regulation Biosimilars
Safety First - Sizing Up Biologics Side Effects

December 2, 2014

0 min read

Biologic medicines present unique challenges for pharmacovigilance. And with biosimilars hitting the market, life just got more complicated – especially when products share the same name.

United Science Stands
Small Molecules Standards & Regulation
United Science Stands

December 2, 2014

0 min read

Sitting Down With… William Chin, Executive Vice President, Scientific and Regulatory Affairs, Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA).

The Medicine Maker
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.