The pharma industry has been a slow adopter of social media – an issue The Medicine Maker covered back in 2014 (1). Now, two pharma companies, GlaxoSmithKline and Bayer, have come first and second, respectively, in a ranking of online corporate performance. What happened? The annual Index of Online Excellence, produced by Bowen Craggs & Co, a research and consultancy group specializing in corporate communications, for the last 12 years, covers all online corporate communications channels – websites, social media, and apps. The final list is drawn from the Bowen Craggs subscriber database, and contains scores and best practice from more than 100 global companies.
“We created this ranking for one clear reason: to identify best practice in all areas of online corporate communications, so companies can learn from it,” says Scott Payton, Managing Partner of Bowen Craggs & Co. The last time a pharma company came in at number one was almost 10 years ago – Roche in 2009. And Roche remains a strong contender, making number eight in 2018. Does this mean the tide is turning for pharma? The authors of the Bowen Craggs report think so; signs point to a change in larger companies who have historically failed to allocate adequate resources to their online presence – a mistake, says Payton. “I believe that a corporate website is the most powerful and important ‘publication’ that any company has in terms of readership, global reach, size and influence. For pharma companies, reputation management is a business-critical issue. And a strong online presence is the most powerful tool for safeguarding and boosting a pharma company’s reputation in the world at large,” says Payton. “As a general rule, companies that take reputation management seriously invest time, thought and money into online corporate communications – and have the best online estates.”
So what makes for a truly excellent online presence? Bowen Craggs judges companies across eight metrics:
- Construction: covering navigation, ease of user orientation, integration, quality of internal search engine and Google visibility
- Message: covering strength of home page, visual impact, internationalism and quality of company information
- Contact provisions: covering the prominence and quality of phone, email and social media contact points for all audience groups online – as well as “self-service provisions” like FAQs
- Serving society: covering corporate governance information, service for CSR professionals and reputation-building material as a whole
- Serving investors: covering service for analysts who follow the company, service for those researching it, and private investors
- Serving media professionals: covering quality of the press release provision, press contacts, press briefing materials and image library
- Serving jobseekers
- Serving customers
References
- S Sutton, C Barker, “Liking Social Pharma”, The Medicine Maker, 0214, 21–27 (2014). Available at: tmm.txp.to/0214/brave. Bowen Craggs & Co., “Index of Online Excellence 2018”, (2018). Available at: bit.ly/BCRanking. Accessed March 8, 2018.