Conexiant
Login
  • The Analytical Scientist
  • The Cannabis Scientist
  • The Medicine Maker
  • The Ophthalmologist
  • The Pathologist
  • The Traditional Scientist
The Medicine Maker
  • Explore

    Explore

    • Latest
    • Features
    • Interviews
    • Business & Trends
    • Technology & Manufacturing
    • Product Profiles
    • White Papers

    Featured Topics

    • Biopharma
    • Small Molecules
    • Cell & Gene
    • Future of Pharma

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
    • Cell and Gene Therapy Supplement
  • Topics

    Topics

    • Drug Discovery
    • Development & Clinical
    • Formulation
    • Drug Delivery
    • Bioprocessing
    • Small Molecules
    • Cell and Gene
    • Facilities & Equipment
    • Outsourcing
    • Packaging
    • Supply Chain
    • Regulation & Standards
  • News & Blogs

    News & Blogs

    • Industry News
    • Research News
    • Blogs
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Community & Awards

    Community & Awards

    • Power List
    • Sitting Down With
    • Innovation Awards
    • Company of the Year Awards
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • eBooks
Subscribe
Subscribe
The Medicine Maker / Issues / 2016 / Articles / Jun / A Vouch for Caution
Business & Regulation Business Practice Trends & Forecasts

A Vouch for Caution

Will expanding the Priority Review Voucher scheme defeat its original purpose?

By James Strachan 06/24/2016 1 min read

Share

The FDA has issued priority review vouchers (PRV) to incentivize drug development for rare or neglected diseases since 2007 – and such a voucher is a valuable prize since it allows a company to expedite the review of any one of its new drugs by four months. The voucher can also be sold on the open market for millions of US dollars.

Many argue that the scheme has been a success – so much so that US Congress is looking to expand it to other areas. But is expansion necessarily a good thing? David Ridley, a professor at Duke University’s Fuqua School of Business urges caution, as increasing the supply of diseases eligible for vouchers will increase the number of vouchers and decrease the price. “Lower voucher prices will mean lower incentives for innovation for diseases that are currently eligible for vouchers,” he says. The PRV program was developed based on a 2006 paper written by Ridley and his colleagues Jeff Moe and Henry Grabowski (1). “We had good luck in several ways, including timing. Congress passes major FDA legislation every 5 years (when FDA user fees are renewed), and 2007 was one of those years,” says Ridley. “Potential voucher buyers were initially cautious because they didn’t want to pay hundreds of millions of dollars based on an unproven voucher mechanism, but now there are many developers with funding and drugs in the pipeline thanks to the voucher incentive.” According to Ridley, the voucher price has risen from $67.5 million to $350 million – which is certainly a good incentive for a drug developer. The scheme has also been well received by both the industry and sponsors in Congress (particularly as the vouchers do not require the allocation of additional government funding). The list of diseases eligible for the PRV program was expanded earlier this year to incentivize the development of treatments addressing the Zika virus outbreak. Senators and representatives are also considering creating other PRV programs for generics and neonatal treatments. Ripley hopes that members of Congress will be cautious about expanding the program. As an example, he has estimated that if only one priority review voucher is available in a year, it will be worth in excess of $200 million. If four vouchers are available, however, then the value could drop to below $100 million.

Newsletters

Receive the latest analytical science news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

References

  1. DB Ridley, HG Grabowski and JL Moe, “Developing drugs for developing countries”, Health Aff, 25, 313-324 (2006). DB Ridley and SA Regnier, “The commercial market for priority review vouchers”, Health Aff, 35, 776-783 (2016). PMID: 27140982.

About the Author(s)

James Strachan

Over the course of my Biomedical Sciences degree it dawned on me that my goal of becoming a scientist didn’t quite mesh with my lack of affinity for lab work. Thinking on my decision to pursue biology rather than English at age 15 – despite an aptitude for the latter – I realized that science writing was a way to combine what I loved with what I was good at. From there I set out to gather as much freelancing experience as I could, spending 2 years developing scientific content for International Innovation, before completing an MSc in Science Communication. After gaining invaluable experience in supporting the communications efforts of CERN and IN-PART, I joined Texere – where I am focused on producing consistently engaging, cutting-edge and innovative content for our specialist audiences around the world.

More Articles by James Strachan

False

Advertisement

Recommended

False

Related Content

What Trump’s Latest Moves Mean for the Industry
Business Practice Standards & Regulation Trends & Forecasts Bioprocessing - Upstream & Downstream
What Trump’s Latest Moves Mean for the Industry

May 27, 2025

6 min read

Audrey Greenberg’s latest insight on US-based manufacturing, Trump’s “Administration for A Healthy America”, and an ever-shifting regulatory environment.

Big Bad Pharma?
Business Practice Trends & Forecasts
Big Bad Pharma?

December 1, 2014

0 min read

The Ebola media frenzy has reminded the public how selfish our industry is. But, somehow, that doesn’t sound quite right...

Access All Areas
Business Practice Trends & Forecasts
Access All Areas

December 1, 2014

0 min read

The 2014 Access to Medicine index shows progress – but companies remain “conservative”

Care to ‘Patent Dance’?
Business Practice Trends & Forecasts
Care to ‘Patent Dance’?

December 1, 2014

0 min read

Amgen accuses Sandoz of snubbing its advances in a complex biosimilar dispute

The Medicine Maker
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.