Conexiant
Login
  • The Analytical Scientist
  • The Cannabis Scientist
  • The Medicine Maker
  • The Ophthalmologist
  • The Pathologist
  • The Traditional Scientist
The Medicine Maker
  • Explore

    Explore

    • Latest
    • Features
    • Interviews
    • Business & Trends
    • Technology & Manufacturing
    • Product Profiles
    • White Papers

    Featured Topics

    • Biopharma
    • Small Molecules
    • Cell & Gene
    • Future of Pharma

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
    • Cell and Gene Therapy Supplement
  • Topics

    Topics

    • Drug Discovery
    • Development & Clinical
    • Formulation
    • Drug Delivery
    • Bioprocessing
    • Small Molecules
    • Cell and Gene
    • Facilities & Equipment
    • Outsourcing
    • Packaging
    • Supply Chain
    • Regulation & Standards
  • News & Blogs

    News & Blogs

    • Industry News
    • Research News
    • Blogs
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Community & Awards

    Community & Awards

    • Power List
    • Sitting Down With
    • Innovation Awards
    • Company of the Year Awards
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • eBooks
Subscribe
Subscribe
The Medicine Maker / Issues / 2015 / Articles / Sep / Accepting R&D Failure
Business & Regulation Business Practice Trends & Forecasts

Accepting R&D Failure

To file, or not to file – that is the question when it comes to IND applications. Companies don’t always make the right choice, but learning when to abandon ship can open the door to potential future gains.

By Stephanie Vine 09/22/2015 1 min read

Share

Admitting defeat in pharma R&D and terminating a failing project is a hard decision to make – and sometimes companies file for an Investigational New Drug (IND) application despite unpromising data. Why? A group of researchers recently asked this very question and decided to publish an article on the subject to highlight the issue (1). We spoke to one of the authors, Dennis Lendrem, translational research project manager at the University of Newcastle’s Institute of Cellular Medicine, about the problems facing R&D.

The Seven-Point Plan

Newsletters

Receive the latest analytical science news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

References

  1. Richard W. Peck et al., Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, doi:10.1038/nrd4725 (2015). Dennis Lendrem et al., Pharm Stat., 14(1), 1-3 (2014).

About the Author(s)

Stephanie Vine

Making great scientific magazines isn’t just about delivering knowledge and high quality content; it’s also about packaging these in the right words to ensure that someone is truly inspired by a topic. My passion is ensuring that our authors’ expertise is presented as a seamless and enjoyable reading experience, whether in print, in digital or on social media. I’ve spent fourteen years writing and editing features for scientific and manufacturing publications, and in making this content engaging and accessible without sacrificing its scientific integrity. There is nothing better than a magazine with great content that feels great to read.

More Articles by Stephanie Vine

False

Advertisement

Recommended

False

Related Content

What Trump’s Latest Moves Mean for the Industry
Business Practice Standards & Regulation Trends & Forecasts Bioprocessing - Upstream & Downstream
What Trump’s Latest Moves Mean for the Industry

May 27, 2025

6 min read

Audrey Greenberg’s latest insight on US-based manufacturing, Trump’s “Administration for A Healthy America”, and an ever-shifting regulatory environment.

Big Bad Pharma?
Business Practice Trends & Forecasts
Big Bad Pharma?

December 1, 2014

0 min read

The Ebola media frenzy has reminded the public how selfish our industry is. But, somehow, that doesn’t sound quite right...

Access All Areas
Business Practice Trends & Forecasts
Access All Areas

December 1, 2014

0 min read

The 2014 Access to Medicine index shows progress – but companies remain “conservative”

Care to ‘Patent Dance’?
Business Practice Trends & Forecasts
Care to ‘Patent Dance’?

December 1, 2014

0 min read

Amgen accuses Sandoz of snubbing its advances in a complex biosimilar dispute

The Medicine Maker
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.