Conexiant
Login
  • The Analytical Scientist
  • The Cannabis Scientist
  • The Medicine Maker
  • The Ophthalmologist
  • The Pathologist
  • The Traditional Scientist
The Medicine Maker
  • Explore

    Explore

    • Latest
    • Features
    • Interviews
    • Business & Trends
    • Technology & Manufacturing
    • Product Profiles
    • White Papers

    Featured Topics

    • Biopharma
    • Small Molecules
    • Cell & Gene
    • Future of Pharma

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
    • Cell and Gene Therapy Supplement
  • Topics

    Topics

    • Drug Discovery
    • Development & Clinical
    • Formulation
    • Drug Delivery
    • Bioprocessing
    • Small Molecules
    • Cell and Gene
    • Facilities & Equipment
    • Outsourcing
    • Packaging
    • Supply Chain
    • Regulation & Standards
  • News & Blogs

    News & Blogs

    • Industry News
    • Research News
    • Blogs
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Community & Awards

    Community & Awards

    • Power List
    • Sitting Down With
    • Innovation Awards
    • Company of the Year Awards
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • eBooks
Subscribe
Subscribe
The Medicine Maker / Issues / 2015 / Articles / Mar / Collaborate or Stagnate
Business & Regulation Business Practice Trends & Forecasts

Collaborate or Stagnate

Can pharma get over its IP anxiety and embrace meaningful partnerships?

By Charlotte Barker 03/09/2015 1 min read

Share

Collaboration within companies is clearly vital, and these days big pharma working with biotechs is a given. Pharma companies have a long history of partnering with academia too – on page 10, University of California professor Greg Weiss reports that he has already had a number of calls from companies wanting to explore the exciting technology he has developed.

Unsurprisingly, collaboration between rival companies is much less common. However, in “Meet The Green Team”, green chemistry consultant Andy Wells draws attention to the “remarkable” increase in pre-competitive industry collaboration over the past 10 years. Why? To find leaner, greener manufacturing strategies. As well as joining forces on sustainability initiatives, companies have been collaborating on large-scale R&D projects (1) and working together to help develop new licensing pathways (2).

Collaboration – or at least meaningful collaboration – is by no means easy. Historically, pharma has had a propriety culture, not well suited to sharing knowledge. Many big pharma companies still struggle to be team players. A recent survey of biotechs shows the perceived ‘partnering skills’ of top drug companies lagging well behind their technical capabilities (3). If the biotech–big pharma relationship, with its clear benefits for both sides, can be difficult to manage, partnerships between rivals are harder still. Like a marriage, a good partnership requires hard work and compromise from all parties.

Ultimately, increased collaboration may be a necessity rather than a choice. The days of big pharma profits generated solely by in-house R&D are long gone, and perhaps that’s no bad thing. Done right, collaboration allows us to become more than the sum of our parts. It broadens our horizons, helping us look beyond the obvious to see new and creative solutions. In fact, what if we stepped outside the limits of the pharma industry altogether? GlaxoSmithKline did just that when forming a partnership with Formula 1 team McLaren. An odd combination? Not really. McLaren can replace all four tires on a racecar in four seconds – imagine the savings if pharma manufacturing could harness that efficiency. There is no doubt that pharma companies can collaborate successfully. During World War Two, US and UK drug makers formed government-backed coalitions to scale up manufacturing of penicillin, saving countless lives on both sides of the Atlantic (4). Today, as well as conflict and disease, we’re facing new challenges caused by our reckless use of resources. If we can harness the collective brainpower, skill and commitment of this industry towards solving the world’s problems, we will all benefit.

Charlotte Barker
Editor

charlotte barker signature

Newsletters

Receive the latest analytical science news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

References

  1. C. Barker, “United Science Stands”, The Medicine Maker 3, 50-51 (2014).
  2. L. Baird, “Adapting to the Future of Licensing”, The Medicine Maker 2, 40-42 (2014).
  3. The Boston Consulting Group, “2014 Biopharmaceutical Partnering Survey” (January 2015),
  4. V. Quirke, “Collaboration in the Pharmaceutical Industry”, Taylor & Francis, New York, NY, USA, p. 114 (2008).

About the Author(s)

Charlotte Barker

As an Editor at Texere, I’m working closely with our audience to create vibrant, engaging content that reflects the hard work and passion that goes into bringing new medicines to market. I got my start in biomedical publishing as a commissioning editor for healthcare journals and have spent my career covering everything from early-stage research to clinical medicine, so I know my way around. And I can’t think of a more interesting, challenging or important area to be working in.

More Articles by Charlotte Barker

False

Advertisement

Recommended

False

Related Content

What Trump’s Latest Moves Mean for the Industry
Business Practice Standards & Regulation Trends & Forecasts Bioprocessing - Upstream & Downstream
What Trump’s Latest Moves Mean for the Industry

May 27, 2025

6 min read

Audrey Greenberg’s latest insight on US-based manufacturing, Trump’s “Administration for A Healthy America”, and an ever-shifting regulatory environment.

Big Bad Pharma?
Business Practice Trends & Forecasts
Big Bad Pharma?

December 1, 2014

0 min read

The Ebola media frenzy has reminded the public how selfish our industry is. But, somehow, that doesn’t sound quite right...

Access All Areas
Business Practice Trends & Forecasts
Access All Areas

December 1, 2014

0 min read

The 2014 Access to Medicine index shows progress – but companies remain “conservative”

Care to ‘Patent Dance’?
Business Practice Trends & Forecasts
Care to ‘Patent Dance’?

December 1, 2014

0 min read

Amgen accuses Sandoz of snubbing its advances in a complex biosimilar dispute

The Medicine Maker
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.