Conexiant
Login
  • The Analytical Scientist
  • The Cannabis Scientist
  • The Medicine Maker
  • The Ophthalmologist
  • The Pathologist
  • The Traditional Scientist
The Medicine Maker
  • Explore

    Explore

    • Latest
    • Features
    • Interviews
    • Business & Trends
    • Technology & Manufacturing
    • Product Profiles
    • White Papers

    Featured Topics

    • Biopharma
    • Small Molecules
    • Cell & Gene
    • Future of Pharma

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
    • Cell and Gene Therapy Supplement
  • Topics

    Techniques & Tools

    • Drug Discovery
    • Development & Clinical
    • Formulation
    • Drug Delivery
    • Bioprocessing
    • Small Molecules
    • Cell and Gene
    • Facilities & Equipment
    • Outsourcing
    • Packaging
    • Supply Chain
    • Regulation & Standards

    Applications & Fields

    • Clinical
    • Environmental
    • Food, Beverage & Agriculture
    • Pharma & Biopharma
    • Omics
    • Forensics
  • News & Blogs

    News & Blogs

    • Industry News
    • Research News
    • Blogs
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Community & Awards

    Community & Awards

    • Power List
    • Sitting Down With
    • Innovation Awards
    • Company of the Year Awards
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • eBooks
Subscribe
Subscribe
The Medicine Maker / Issues / 2014 / Articles / Dec / Regulators Target Ebola
Business & Regulation Standards & Regulation Business & Trends

Regulators Target Ebola

Will FDA fast review and voucher incentives make a difference?

By Stephanie Vine 12/01/2014 0 min read

Share

US senators are working to introduce a bill to encourage pharma and biotech companies to develop new treatments and vaccines against Ebola. Specifically, the bill would add Ebola to FDA’s priority review voucher program, first introduced in 2007. The program incentivizes the development of medicines for neglected tropical diseases. As well as providing faster review of the qualifying medicine, the FDA also awards a priority review voucher to the developer, which can be used for any other product, whether qualifying or not.

0314-206-upfront-main

The vouchers can also be sold, but only once, and overall they are considered less valuable than vouchers offered through other FDA programs, such as the FDA’s rare pediatric disease voucher program (one of which was sold by BioMarin for $67.5 million earlier this year). Vouchers obtained through the neglected tropical diseases program can only be redeemed by giving the FDA 365-days’ notice and have rarely been used by companies. Therefore, critics are dubious as to whether adding Ebola to the list will have a positive – or any – impact (1). Especially as it could be months before any Ebola drug is eligible for the scheme since companies must first receive full approval for their investigational new drug application. Sixteen diseases currently qualify for the program, but Ebola is not one of them since previous outbreaks have been sporadic and the death toll lower than diseases like cholera, malaria and tuberculosis.

Meanwhile, Europe is also trying to spur development; the Innovative Medicines Initiative recently issued a €280-million call for projects to boost European research into Ebola. The funding will cover “urgent action” to address the current epidemic and a long-term strategy for managing future outbreaks.

Newsletters

Receive the latest analytical science news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

References

  1. A. Gaffney, “Senators Call for Expansion of FDA Program to Help Fight Ebola”, 28 October 2014, http://www.raps.org

About the Author(s)

Stephanie Vine

Making great scientific magazines isn’t just about delivering knowledge and high quality content; it’s also about packaging these in the right words to ensure that someone is truly inspired by a topic. My passion is ensuring that our authors’ expertise is presented as a seamless and enjoyable reading experience, whether in print, in digital or on social media. I’ve spent fourteen years writing and editing features for scientific and manufacturing publications, and in making this content engaging and accessible without sacrificing its scientific integrity. There is nothing better than a magazine with great content that feels great to read.

More Articles by Stephanie Vine

False

Advertisement

Recommended

False

Related Content

What Trump’s Latest Moves Mean for the Industry
Business Practice Standards & Regulation Trends & Forecasts Bioprocessing - Upstream & Downstream
What Trump’s Latest Moves Mean for the Industry

May 27, 2025

6 min read

Audrey Greenberg’s latest insight on US-based manufacturing, Trump’s “Administration for A Healthy America”, and an ever-shifting regulatory environment.

Regulators Target Ebola
Standards & Regulation
Regulators Target Ebola

December 1, 2014

0 min read

Will FDA fast review and voucher incentives make a difference?

Safety First - Sizing Up Biologics Side Effects
Standards & Regulation Biosimilars
Safety First - Sizing Up Biologics Side Effects

December 2, 2014

0 min read

Biologic medicines present unique challenges for pharmacovigilance. And with biosimilars hitting the market, life just got more complicated – especially when products share the same name.

United Science Stands
Small Molecules Standards & Regulation
United Science Stands

December 2, 2014

0 min read

Sitting Down With… William Chin, Executive Vice President, Scientific and Regulatory Affairs, Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA).

The Medicine Maker
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.