Conexiant
Login
  • The Analytical Scientist
  • The Cannabis Scientist
  • The Medicine Maker
  • The Ophthalmologist
  • The Pathologist
  • The Traditional Scientist
The Medicine Maker
  • Explore

    Explore

    • Latest
    • Features
    • Interviews
    • Business & Trends
    • Technology & Manufacturing
    • Product Profiles
    • White Papers

    Featured Topics

    • Biopharma
    • Small Molecules
    • Cell & Gene
    • Future of Pharma

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
    • Cell and Gene Therapy Supplement
  • Topics

    Topics

    • Drug Discovery
    • Development & Clinical
    • Formulation
    • Drug Delivery
    • Bioprocessing
    • Small Molecules
    • Cell and Gene
    • Facilities & Equipment
    • Outsourcing
    • Packaging
    • Supply Chain
    • Regulation & Standards
  • News & Blogs

    News & Blogs

    • Industry News
    • Research News
    • Blogs
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Community & Awards

    Community & Awards

    • Power List
    • Sitting Down With
    • Innovation Awards
    • Company of the Year Awards
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • eBooks
Subscribe
Subscribe
The Medicine Maker / Issues / 2017 / Articles / Sep / Cater to the Customer
Discovery & Development Clinical Trials

Cater to the Customer

Efficacious and safe drugs often don’t make it to market. But why? And what can you do about it?

By James Strachan 09/20/2017 1 min read

Share

Why do drugs fail? Research shows that efficacy and safety are significant reasons – as you might expect. But one surprising statistic is that one quarter of failures at phase II and III are because of commercial or strategic reasons (1). In addition, a number of drugs, although meeting safety and efficacy endpoints, struggled post-approval for other reasons. Will Dunlop, Head of Market Access at Mundipharma International, set out to find an explanation and embarked on a recent study with Nektarios Oraiopoulos, Judge Business School, to identify the key barriers to a customer-focused drug development process, and then set out a comprehensive framework to overcome them (2). Here, Dunlop tells us more.

What are the most important factors in preventing commercial or strategic drug failures?
Collaboration between R&D, commercial and market access teams is crucial to the success of a drug. It’s well reported that payers are playing an increasingly important role in the success of a medicine – and regulatory approval can no longer be considered a guarantee for market success and profitability. Given the increasing budgetary pressures payers are under, pharma companies quite rightly have to demonstrate the benefit of new medicines when compared with existing standards of care. Global healthcare systems cannot afford innovation for innovation’s sake anymore. Companies must have a vision in mind of the difference their therapies will make, and only look for innovations that address both payer and patient needs. 
Do you have any specific examples of strategic failures?
Exubera is an example of a good drug that met regulatory requirements, but was widely reported as being taken off the market due to low sales. The inhalable insulin product cost $5 compared to $2-3 for injectable insulin. In the US, many insurance companies refused to cover the cost of the more expensive treatment; and in the UK, NICE argued that Exubera should only be approved for diabetics with a proven fear of needles.

Can you sum up the main barriers to successful internal collaboration, and your proposed solutions?
The report that we developed in partnership with Cambridge Judge Business School revealed that good science is simply not always enough to get a product to the patient who needs it. We concluded that the main barriers to collaboration can be divided into economic, organizational and behavioral ones – each bringing unique challenges. Economic barriers to collaboration are linked to the substantial timeline required to develop a new therapy. R&D teams are often, understandably, focused on driving their product to the next stage without ensuring it’s the right decision overall. Too many times, we’ve seen these drugs go on to fail at a later stage, when hundreds of millions have been invested. There are also behavioral barriers to collaboration where scientists have invested a lot of time into a compound and become such strong believers in it that they fail to acknowledge the evidence against it. Understanding that this behavioral bias exists and seeking advice from experts is key to overcoming it. Organizationally, there is often an insular culture in which people work closely with and learn only from their own group. Having goals that require a collective effort from all departments forces teams to work together 
more effectively.
What is the most important thing to consider when developing a commercial strategy?
The most important thing is that you really understand the market in-depth at a local level; you need to look through the lens of each of your stakeholders – what does the payer need to see? What will the patient want? What does the health system require? Shaping your strategy around these insights and improving the communication flow between R&D, commercial and market access teams, coupled with strong science, is a good recipe for success.

Newsletters

Receive the latest analytical science news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

References

  1. RK Harrison, “Phase II and phase III failures: 2013-2015”, Nat Rev Drug Discov, 15 (12), 817-8 (2016). PMID: 27811931. N Oraiopoulos and WCN Dunlop, “When science is not enough: a framework towards more customer-focused drug development”, Adv. Ther., 34 (7), 1572-1583 (2017). PMID: 28625003.

About the Author(s)

James Strachan

Over the course of my Biomedical Sciences degree it dawned on me that my goal of becoming a scientist didn’t quite mesh with my lack of affinity for lab work. Thinking on my decision to pursue biology rather than English at age 15 – despite an aptitude for the latter – I realized that science writing was a way to combine what I loved with what I was good at. From there I set out to gather as much freelancing experience as I could, spending 2 years developing scientific content for International Innovation, before completing an MSc in Science Communication. After gaining invaluable experience in supporting the communications efforts of CERN and IN-PART, I joined Texere – where I am focused on producing consistently engaging, cutting-edge and innovative content for our specialist audiences around the world.

More Articles by James Strachan

False

Advertisement

Recommended

False

Related Content

The (Un)fairer Sex?
Clinical Trials
The (Un)fairer Sex?

November 6, 2014

0 min read

Our understanding of the differences in male and female biology is constantly growing – but can we translate that knowledge into better healthcare for all?

Sex Matters
Clinical Trials
Sex Matters

November 6, 2014

0 min read

New NIH policies aim to correct the sex bias in preclinical research

Asking the Right Questions in R&D
Clinical Trials Contract Development Services Trends & Forecasts
Asking the Right Questions in R&D

March 6, 2025

3 min read

And getting the right people involved from the start. Here’s why collaboration is key for successful clinical development.

AI, Big Data, and Digital Disruption
Digital Technologies Clinical Trials
AI, Big Data, and Digital Disruption

March 31, 2025

7 min read

An industry survey looks at changing attitudes and challenges in digital innovation for clinical research. Uptake is slow but steady.

The Medicine Maker
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.