Conexiant
Login
  • The Analytical Scientist
  • The Cannabis Scientist
  • The Medicine Maker
  • The Ophthalmologist
  • The Pathologist
  • The Traditional Scientist
The Medicine Maker
  • Explore

    Explore

    • Latest
    • Features
    • Interviews
    • Business & Trends
    • Technology & Manufacturing
    • Product Profiles
    • White Papers

    Featured Topics

    • Biopharma
    • Small Molecules
    • Cell & Gene
    • Future of Pharma

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
    • Cell and Gene Therapy Supplement
  • Topics

    Topics

    • Drug Discovery
    • Development & Clinical
    • Formulation
    • Drug Delivery
    • Bioprocessing
    • Small Molecules
    • Cell and Gene
    • Facilities & Equipment
    • Outsourcing
    • Packaging
    • Supply Chain
    • Regulation & Standards
  • News & Blogs

    News & Blogs

    • Industry News
    • Research News
    • Blogs
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Community & Awards

    Community & Awards

    • Power List
    • Sitting Down With
    • Innovation Awards
    • Company of the Year Awards
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • eBooks
Subscribe
Subscribe
The Medicine Maker / Issues / 2016 / Articles / Nov / Efficacy vs Effectiveness
Discovery & Development Clinical Trials

Efficacy vs Effectiveness

Tightly controlled trials are poor predictors of real-world outcomes

By William Aryitey 11/21/2016 1 min read

Share

Traditional efficacy trials are not enough to guarantee that a drug will work in the more diverse population seen in the clinic, according to researchers who evaluated the effectiveness of an inhaled drug combination for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in everyday clinical practice (1). “Efficacy studies are limited in their usefulness to clinicians as they are often restricted in their inclusion criteria, meaning that they show what the drugs can do in a controlled setting but not necessarily what they can do in the real world,” says Jørgen Vestbo, first author and professor of respiratory medicine at the University of Manchester, UK.

In fact, the authors suggest that fewer than 10 percent of COPD patients would normally be eligible for efficacy trials, since they typically exclude anyone with a coexisting condition. The investigators carried out a randomized study in patients under the care of general practitioners, without the frequency, monitoring or strict eligibility criteria of a controlled trial, to allow for the variation in adherence, dosing frequency, and inhaler technique seen in unsupervised patients. Rather than efficacy under ideal conditions, the trial assessed the real-world effectiveness of an inhaled combination of fluticasone furoate and vilanterol. The results showed that a broad population of COPD patients benefitted from the inhalant combination, without a significantly greater risk of adverse effects. The authors argue in their paper that incorporating effectiveness trials as a standard component of the translational process would provide much clearer evidence on which to base clinical decisions. “It’s not a question of either/or,” says Vestbo, “Efficacy studies are still needed; however, effectiveness studies are also required to ensure that the drugs have the expected effects in the real world.”

Newsletters

Receive the latest analytical science news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

References

  1. J Vestbo et al, “Effectiveness of fluticasone furoate–vilanterol for COPD in clinical practice”, N Engl J Med, [Epub ahead of print] (2016). PMID: 27593504.

About the Author(s)

William Aryitey

My fascination with science, gaming, and writing led to my studying biology at university, while simultaneously working as an online games journalist. After university, I travelled across Europe, working on a novel and developing a game, before finding my way to Texere. As Associate Editor, I’m evolving my loves of science and writing, while continuing to pursue my passion for gaming and creative writing in a personal capacity.

More Articles by William Aryitey

False

Advertisement

Recommended

False

Related Content

The (Un)fairer Sex?
Clinical Trials
The (Un)fairer Sex?

November 6, 2014

0 min read

Our understanding of the differences in male and female biology is constantly growing – but can we translate that knowledge into better healthcare for all?

Sex Matters
Clinical Trials
Sex Matters

November 6, 2014

0 min read

New NIH policies aim to correct the sex bias in preclinical research

Asking the Right Questions in R&D
Clinical Trials Contract Development Services Trends & Forecasts
Asking the Right Questions in R&D

March 6, 2025

3 min read

And getting the right people involved from the start. Here’s why collaboration is key for successful clinical development.

AI, Big Data, and Digital Disruption
Digital Technologies Clinical Trials
AI, Big Data, and Digital Disruption

March 31, 2025

7 min read

An industry survey looks at changing attitudes and challenges in digital innovation for clinical research. Uptake is slow but steady.

The Medicine Maker
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.