Conexiant
Login
  • The Analytical Scientist
  • The Cannabis Scientist
  • The Medicine Maker
  • The Ophthalmologist
  • The Pathologist
  • The Traditional Scientist
The Medicine Maker
  • Explore

    Explore

    • Latest
    • Features
    • Interviews
    • Business & Trends
    • Technology & Manufacturing
    • Product Profiles
    • White Papers

    Featured Topics

    • Biopharma
    • Small Molecules
    • Cell & Gene
    • Future of Pharma

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
    • Cell and Gene Therapy Supplement
  • Topics

    Topics

    • Drug Discovery
    • Development & Clinical
    • Formulation
    • Drug Delivery
    • Bioprocessing
    • Small Molecules
    • Cell and Gene
    • Facilities & Equipment
    • Outsourcing
    • Packaging
    • Supply Chain
    • Regulation & Standards
  • News & Blogs

    News & Blogs

    • Industry News
    • Research News
    • Blogs
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Community & Awards

    Community & Awards

    • Power List
    • Sitting Down With
    • Innovation Awards
    • Company of the Year Awards
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • eBooks
Subscribe
Subscribe
The Medicine Maker / Issues / 2016 / Articles / Jun / Failure to Launch
Business & Regulation Clinical Trials Standards & Regulation Regulation & Standards Business & Trends

Failure to Launch

How difficult is it to develop a new drug? Statistics have the answer

By James Strachan 06/24/2016 1 min read

Share

Taking a promising drug all the way through to regulatory approval is a long, difficult process – and successes are rare. Most drugs fail before they reach the clinic, and most drugs that reach the clinic fail before approval. Diving deeper into the problem, the Biotechnology Innovation Organization (BIO) teamed up with Amplion (a biomarker business intelligence company) and BioMedtracker (a service that tracks a drug’s likelihood of approval by the FDA). BIO examined clinical trial success rates from 2006 to 2015, and 9,985 clinical and regulatory phase transitions were recorded and analyzed from 7,455 development programs, across 1,103 companies in the BioMedtracker database.

The study revealed that phase II clinical programs continue to experience the lowest success rate of the four development phases, with only 30.7 percent of developmental candidates advancing to phase III. For all diseases analyzed, only around 10 percent of drugs in phase I trials made it to approval. However, the study also showed that using biomarkers as selection criteria could dramatically increase success rates. Our infographic gives more information.

Newsletters

Receive the latest analytical science news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

References

  1. D W Thomas et al., “Clinical development success rates 2006-2015”, (2016). Available at: http://bit.ly/1UfCn1S. Accessed June 9, 2016.

About the Author(s)

James Strachan

Over the course of my Biomedical Sciences degree it dawned on me that my goal of becoming a scientist didn’t quite mesh with my lack of affinity for lab work. Thinking on my decision to pursue biology rather than English at age 15 – despite an aptitude for the latter – I realized that science writing was a way to combine what I loved with what I was good at. From there I set out to gather as much freelancing experience as I could, spending 2 years developing scientific content for International Innovation, before completing an MSc in Science Communication. After gaining invaluable experience in supporting the communications efforts of CERN and IN-PART, I joined Texere – where I am focused on producing consistently engaging, cutting-edge and innovative content for our specialist audiences around the world.

More Articles by James Strachan

False

Advertisement

Recommended

False

Related Content

The (Un)fairer Sex?
Clinical Trials
The (Un)fairer Sex?

November 6, 2014

0 min read

Our understanding of the differences in male and female biology is constantly growing – but can we translate that knowledge into better healthcare for all?

Sex Matters
Clinical Trials
Sex Matters

November 6, 2014

0 min read

New NIH policies aim to correct the sex bias in preclinical research

Asking the Right Questions in R&D
Clinical Trials Contract Development Services Trends & Forecasts
Asking the Right Questions in R&D

March 6, 2025

3 min read

And getting the right people involved from the start. Here’s why collaboration is key for successful clinical development.

AI, Big Data, and Digital Disruption
Digital Technologies Clinical Trials
AI, Big Data, and Digital Disruption

March 31, 2025

7 min read

An industry survey looks at changing attitudes and challenges in digital innovation for clinical research. Uptake is slow but steady.

The Medicine Maker
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.